complains that cultural explanations of Protestant politics have ignored other structural reasons1 (70)
criticises Burdick for focusing on the AoG2 (71-72)
Latin American Protestants "traditional authoritarian practices and discourses are frequently reproduced simultaneously with individual expression as leaders and congregants attempt to re-interpret and give meaning to their life experience."3 (75)
lack of internal democratic practices inside Latin American Protestant churches unlikely to lead to external democratic practices4 (76)
claims a lack of Protestant ethic in Latin America; neo-pentecostal focus on consumerism5 (77-78)
Latin American Protestantism do not view work or capital accumulation as a sign of election6 (78)
Pentecostalism as a means for coping with poverty7 (78-79)
Reed Nelson: typology of Protestant organizations. (1) Bureaucratic: historical protestantism; highly rational, alien to Brazil not able to respond dynamically (2) traditional Pentecostals, focus on doctrine and practice (3) clientilist; (neo) Pentecostals fluid, need converts, religius entrepeneurs, take clientilism into politics8 (80-81)
Freston "importance attached by Protestant elites to ensuring that the symbols of the Kingdom be interposed over the politics of the world" --> e.g. concern with open Bibles9 (83)
"there is no invariant relationship Protestantism and authoritarianism or democracy."10 (85)
"when individual use of religion to make sense of a political economy undergoing rapid individualization, religions that explain outcomes in terms of individual effort are likely to be seen more common-sensical."11 (85)
1NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 70.
2NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 71–72.
3NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 75.
4NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 76.
5NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 77–78.
6NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 78.
7NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 78–79.
8NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 80–81.
9NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 83.
10NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 85.
11NJ Gaskill, “Rethinking Protestantism and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America,” Sociology of Religon 58:1 (1997) 69-91, 85.
No comments:
Post a Comment